LEAD 360 Public

LEAD 360 评估系统 (公开版)

A. Your Self-Assessment 自我评估

Input your answers manually below, or use the "Start Assessment" button.
若您已有数据可直接录入,或点击“启动测评”马上进行在线评估。

- OR 或 -
B. Feedback Entry 他人反馈录入 (手动输入)

LEADERSHIP STYLE ANALYSIS REPORT

Generated by SummitsEdu

1. SELF-ASSESSMENT 自我评估
Primary Style 主导风格:
Secondary Style 支持风格:
📖 Core Concepts 核心概念
Readiness 准备度 (R1-R4) The extent to which a follower has the ability and willingness to accomplish a specific task.
追随者完成特定任务的能力和意愿程度。
R1: Unable and Unwilling or Insecure. 没能力且没意愿或不安。
R2: Unable but Willing or Confident. 没能力但有意愿或信心。
R3: Able but Unwilling or Insecure. 有能力但没意愿或不安。
R4: Able and Willing or Confident. 有能力且有意愿或信心。
Leadership Styles 领导风格 (S1-S4) The patterns of behavior (words and actions) of the leader as perceived by others.
他人感知到的领导者行为模式(言语和行动)。
S1 Telling 告知: High Task / Low Relationship. 高工作 / 低关系行为。
S2 Selling 推销: High Task / High Relationship. 高工作 / 高支持行为。
S3 Participating 参与: Low Task / High Relationship. 低工作 / 高关系行为。
S4 Delegating 授权: Low Task / Low Relationship. 低工作 / 低关系行为。
Feedforward Key 分析关键 Based on the match between Style and Readiness (not Self vs Other). 基于风格与准备度的匹配。
Over-Leading 过度领导:
Using High Task (S1/S2) with High Readiness (R3/R4). Too much structure.
对高准备度追随者使用了过多的指导行为。
Under-Leading 领导不足:
Using Low Task (S3/S4) with Low Readiness (R1/R2). Missing structure.
对低准备度追随者缺乏必要的指导行为。